References
A
Abdullah, M. R. T. L., & Siraj, S. (2010). M-learning curriculum design for secondary school: A needs analysis. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 42, 1624–1629.
B
Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The Role of Design in Research: The Integrative Learning Design Framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001021
Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T (1998). From practice fields to communities of practice. CRLT Technical Report No. 1‐98
Berking, P., Birtwhistle, M., & Haag, J. (2013). MoTIF Project Mobile Learning Survey Report. Retrieved from http://motif.adlnet.gov
Black, J. E, Mcclintock, R. 1996. Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. In WILSON, B. (Ed), Educational Technology Publications. USA. Englewood Cliffs
C
Clark N. Quinn. 76. (2011). <em>Designing mLearning: Tapping into the Mobile Revolution for Organizational Performance.
Collins, A., Seeley Brown, J., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20457
D
Daniels, S. R., Wang, G., Lawong, D., & Ferris, G. R. (2017). Collective assessment of the human resources management field: Meta-analytic needs and theory development prospects for the future. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.002
Dewey John. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York: Free Press. Retrieved from Google Scholar
E
Elif Polat, E.; Cagiltay, K.; & Karasu, N. (2019). Tangible Objects and Mobile Technology: Interactive Learning Environments for Students with Learning Disabilities. In Zhang, Y., & Cristol, D. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning (2nd ed.) (pp. 635-653). Singapore: Springer
Enactivist Theory. (2018, January 21). ETEC 510, . Retrieved 16:37, September 20, 2020 from http://etec.ctlt.ubc.ca/510wiki/index.php?title=Enactivist_Theory&oldid=63883.
G
Geuna, S. (2000, November 20). Appreciating the difference between design-based and model-based sampling strategies in quantitative morphology of the nervous system. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9861(20001120)427:3<333::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-T
K
Kimball, M. (2005). Database e-portfolio systems: A critical appraisal. Computers and Composition, 22(4), 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.08.003
M
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Child Psychology and Pedagogy: The Sorbonne Lectures 1949-1952. Translated by Talia Welsh. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2010.
McGee, P., & Reis, A. (2012). Blended course design: A synthesis of best practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network.
McQuiggan, S., Kosturko, L., McQuiggan, J., & Sabourin, J. (2015). Mobile learning: A handbook for developers, educators, and learners (pp. 1-21). New Jersey: Wiley & Sons.
N
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. NIH Publication No. 00-4769, 7, 35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.1950070418
iNACOL/International Association for K-12 Online Learning. (2011). National Standards for Quality Online Courses, Version 2. iNACOL (pp. 1–46). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.05.010
P
Plomp, R., Nieveen, N. (2007). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai.
S
Storberg-Walker, J. (2008). Wenger’s Communities of Practice Revisited: A (Failed?) Exercise in Applied Communities of Practice Theory-Building Research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308319541
Sumara, D. J., & Davis, B. (1997). Enactivist theory and community learning: Toward a complexified understanding of action research. Educational Action Research, 5(3), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799700200037
W
Wenger, E. (1998). Community of Practice: a Brief Introduction. Communities, 15(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.2277/0521663636
Wertsch, James V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.